<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wait, is static typing good or bad?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://yonkeltron.com/2008/05/30/wait-is-static-typing-good-or-bad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://yonkeltron.com/2008/05/30/wait-is-static-typing-good-or-bad/</link>
	<description>Temporary Exile</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Will Thompson</title>
		<link>http://yonkeltron.com/2008/05/30/wait-is-static-typing-good-or-bad/#comment-29112</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Thompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 00:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yonkeltron.com/?p=195#comment-29112</guid>
		<description>So, Haskell isn't dynamically typed in the slightest. If you don't annotate a function with its type, the most general possible type will be inferred, and if it is untypeable the compiler will shout at you. You can't¹ turn off the type system.

¹ (You can use modules like Data.Dynamic to simulate dynamic typing.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, Haskell isn&#8217;t dynamically typed in the slightest. If you don&#8217;t annotate a function with its type, the most general possible type will be inferred, and if it is untypeable the compiler will shout at you. You can&#8217;t¹ turn off the type system.</p>
<p>¹ (You can use modules like Data.Dynamic to simulate dynamic typing.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 4.731 seconds -->
